|
|
Post by danimalg633 on Nov 30, 2010 4:50:58 GMT -5
Strategically, both NaOnka and Dan are great choices for someone to carry to the finals. I doubt anyone on the jury would give either one a million dollars regardless of who they were up against. But, if you had to choose, which one would you take with you and why?
|
|
|
|
Post by outlast on Nov 30, 2010 10:18:37 GMT -5
Naonka. Dan may be useless in challenges, but everyone seems to like him.
The best person to take to the end might actually be Chase. After these last two weeks I think even Naonka could be Chase.
|
|
|
|
Post by loghead on Dec 1, 2010 6:30:48 GMT -5
After I've seen the re-cap episode I'm not so sure anymore whether you should take Dan to the end.
He's playing a decent social game and he's not the mastermind behind any blind-sites. So depending on the final three (or two) he might be a wild card to win this game.
Imagine a final two Na and Dan. NaOnka couldn't shut her mouth during the normal tribal councils and she probably would dig her own grave in the FTC.
|
|
|
|
Post by Razzmatazz on Dec 17, 2010 5:34:50 GMT -5
Chase thinks Dan is a threat.
|
|
